Saturday, February 16, 2013

Simple Jack?

 Politics Chatter 
POLITICS CHATTER

POLITICS CHATTER: Pondering the wisdom of casting Jack Layton as a saint in CBC TV’s upcoming biopic “Jack”


Rick Roberts plays Jack Layton, while Sook-Yin Lee takes the part of Olivia Chow in the made-for-TV movie "Jack"
Politics Chatter by contributing editor Mark Bourrie is published weekly at OttawaMagazine.com. Follow him on Twitter @IsotelusRex.
Well, all we need is the blessing of the next Pope, and Jack Layton will officially become a saint.
The CBC has worked hard to fast-track the canonization. On March 10, TV viewers will forgo the delights of NetFlix and TLC’s Gypsy Sisters, to sit, enthralled, in front of the magic box, watching a biopic called JACK, the story of Jack Layton’s rise to greatness.
Read the rest at

http://www.ottawamagazine.com/society/politics/2013/02/15/politics-chatter-10/

Thursday, February 07, 2013

Today's National Post Full-Page Piece


(Sorry for the formatting mess. Not much I can do about it, I'm afraid)

Mark Bourrie: The war that made Canada


Mark Bourrie, National Post | Feb 7, 2013 12:01 AM ET | Last Updated:Feb 6, 2013 5:43 PM ET
More from National Post
A 1770 painting by Benjamin West called The Death of General Wolfe depicts his death at the battle of the Plains of Abraham in 1759. That battle was part of the Seven Years’ War.
National Gallery of CanadaA 1770 painting by Benjamin West called The Death of General Wolfe depicts his death at the battle of the Plains of Abraham in 1759. That battle was part of the Seven Years’ War.
Will the Canadian government celebrate the 250th anniversary of the Treaty of Paris, which ended the war that really made Canada?
Except for a brief, small exhibit at the Canadian Museum of Civilization, it’s not likely.
The Treaty of Paris, signed in 1763, settled the Seven Years’ War. That was, in many ways, the First World War. It was fought in Europe, North America, the Caribbean, parts of Africa, India and on the seas. About 500,000 soldiers were killed in total, along with tens, maybe hundreds, of thousands of civilians.
It’s the war that ended with most of what’s eastern Canada and part of the U.S. northeast handed from France to Britain. Quebec is still trying to adapt to the severing of those bonds with the mother country. For most of their history, the descendants of the settlers of New France have fought against the political, cultural and social impact of the “conquest.” It was, for good or ill, the defining moment in Quebec’s history.
On the other hand, the Royal Proclamation, which set out the rules for the government of the new British North American lands, is one of the most liberal manifestos ever issued by any government that had just taken control of an enemy territory.
It’s an astounding document that, in itself, had far more impact on the development of Canada than any single piece of legislation, and was certainly more important to the development of modern Canada than, say, the War of 1812.
The Royal Proclamation established the first legislature in Quebec (which included what’s now Ontario and a chunk of what’s now U.S. territory). Property rights were protected. So were the rights of Catholics — in fact, more so than in Britain itself, and with far more generosity than the British treatment of Irish Catholics.
Indian “tribes and nations” were guaranteed their right to negotiate treaties with the government, making this a sort of Magna Carta for Canada’s aboriginal people.
The Seven Years’ War left deep physical scars on Canada. Some 260 soldiers died with Wolfe and Montcalm at the Battle of the Plains of Abraham in 1759 (which is listed in just about every study of the most important battles in world history, and the only battle in the Seven Years War that most military historians remember.) Another 550 soldiers were killed the next spring, on the same ground, at the Battle of St. Foy, before the British fleet arrived in 1760 and settled the fight over Quebec.
All told, about 5,000 soldiers and sailors died in the fighting in North America, about 1,000 more than were killed in the War of 1812. (And the War of 1812 numbers are skewed by the big British losses at the Battle of New Orleans in 1815, which had no Canadian involvement nor any influence on the outcome of the war.)
Civilian casualties also were far heavier than in the War of 1812: Quebec City was smashed by three months of bombardment from the British fleet and from artillery batteries Wolfe built on the south side of the St. Lawrence. British troops burned the farms and villages on the Isle d’Orleans and in parts of the St. Lawrence Valley. The resulting shortage of food, compounded by hoarding and the vigorous black market operated by New France’s leaders, added to the death and misery.
(My own family has an interesting set of links to the war. One of my ancestors was captain of the militia at the Quebec City suburban siegneurie of Charlesbourg, so was almost certainly involved in the defence of Quebec. On the British side, Nehemiah Gilman of Exeter, N.H., a maternal great-uncle eight generations back, was captured and killed by native warriors at Fort William Henry in 1757. That’s the massacre lying at the heart of James Fenimore Cooper’s The Last of the Mohicans.)
Britain did very well in the Seven Year’s War, capturing Canada, Cuba, the profitable sugar-producing island of Guadeloupe, and a good chunk of French-held India. But during the conflict, it was by no means clear that Britain wanted to keep New France: The surrender documents signed during the war by British and French commanders in Quebec City and Montreal have many stipulations that were dependent on the outcome of peace negotiations.
Between the summer of 1760, when the war effectively ended in Canada, and the signing of the treaty three years later, the British army didn’t seriously meddle in New France. Most French merchants stayed put, relying on British guarantees that they could go back to France if London decided to keep the colony.
High school children may snicker when teachers mention in passing that Britain chose to keep Canada rather than hold onto the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe. But a close look at New France and Guadeloupe shows the French probably got the better part of the deal, at least in the short term.
Guadeloupe, at the time, was one of the most valuable pieces of agricultural real estate in the world, producing both sugar and cotton. New France, on the other hand, always was a net loss to its colonial masters, who had to send troops to protect a fur trade that fed a dying hat industry. Keeping it safe required the upkeep of a northeast Atlantic naval squadron, and the construction of fortresses at Quebec and Louisbourg capable of withstanding bombardment from enemy warships and gigantic mortars that were carried by men o’ war and set up in coastal batteries.
Ownership of New France by the French tied down a French army that had to sit defensively on a large, unproductive area of real estate. Strategically, the French could never do more than hold what they had and pester the Hudson Bay Company in the subarctic. They could not muster the power to drive the British colonists from their thriving and much more populous territories along the Atlantic coast. In fact, for most of the French period, they couldn’t even protect French settlers from the Iroquois.
France walked away from the negotiations with the islands of St. Pierre and Miquelon. They, too, seem insignificant now, but they were the core of the lucrative French fishing operations on the Grand Banks that were guaranteed by the Treat of Paris (along with the right to land on the coast of Newfoundland and set up fish-drying operations). Later, the French islands became highly profitable smuggling ports, especially during the Prohibition period. And they were a spy haven when they were controlled by Vichy France, the Nazi puppet regime in the Second World War. France still owns them, and the islands elect a member to the National Assembly in Paris.
Some 40 years after the Treaty of Paris, Napoleon took a look at the map and realized the old New France was a trap. And so, in the negotiations leading up to the Treaty of Amiens of 1802, Napoleon turned down the Britain’s offer to return Canada. For good measure, he sold Louisiana, too.
Conventional wisdom in the United States says Napoleon was snookered on that deal, but the Emperor knew full well that he couldn’t afford to defend a vast swath of nothingness in central North America. Better to sell it for hard cash than to have it snatched away, by the Americans, the British or Spain.
Guadeloupe was, in economic terms, a much better prize. British troops had seized the place at about the same time they took the St. Lawrence Valley. British planters and slave traders began investing heavily in the island. During the three-year British occupation of Guadeloupe, they brought 40,000 African slaves to the island and bought the French plantations at bargain prices.
The investment paid off. British industries and sugar planters turned a profit of more than 300,000 pounds a year during the time Britain occupied the island. (For an idea of the buying power of that money, a one-pound coin, or sovereign, contained about ¼ of an ounce of gold and paid a soldier for a month.)
All of the sugar islands were valuable, as former Trinidadian prime minister Eric Williams pointed out in his pivotal 1964 volume on colonial Caribbean economics, Capitalism and Slavery. For example, between 1763 and 1773, the sugar imported from Grenada (a place less valuable than Guadeloupe) was eight times more valuable than all of the imports from Canada.
There was considerable debate in Paris and London when the treaty-makers were doing their work. Voltaire wondered why France would be interested in “a few acres of snow” when it could have sugar. An anonymous London pamphleteer asked “what does a few hats signify compared to that luxury, sugar?”
(Maybe, over the years, the French should have sent out more geologists and fewer fur traders. They missed out on the great gold fields of northeastern Ontario, where, in 1907, William Wright stumbled down a hill and landed on a 15-centimetre wide vein of gold. They failed to find the bonanza at Silver Islet near Thunder Bay, where a vein of pure silver lay in plain sight, or the silver at Cobalt, scattered in tarnished lumps on forest floor. And they didn’t even search for the copper that Native people had been mining for centuries along Lake Superior.)
Yasmine Mingay, public affairs manager for the Canadian War Museum, said the museum won’t be doing anything to mark the anniversary, which will be this coming Sunday, Feb. 10. She said the museum covered some of the ground in an exhibition six years ago.
The Canadian Museum of Civilization (soon to be the Museum of Canadian History), is also giving the treaty a pass, but will be exhibiting a copy of the Royal Proclamation next fall “for a few weeks.”
So much for the war that, in time, would give the world the nation we call Canada.
National Post
Mark Bourrie is an Ottawa-based historian and journalist. His most recent book, Fighting Words: Canada’s Best War Reporting, was published last fall by Dundurn Press. Follow him on Twitter @IsotelusRex.

Wednesday, February 06, 2013

Chinese Food and Tears



Looking forward to a nice dinner from my favorite take-out joint, the Yang Sheng in Ottawa.

Sometimes, thinking about dated stereotypes makes me cry. So do heartfelt apologies that somehow don't warrant being included on Top Ten apologies pages.
(BTW, no one ever noticed the sexist stuff).

Sweet and sour pork, egg roles, pad thai...  yum!

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Quill and Quire carries an announcement for Kill the Messengers

Here: http://www.quillandquire.com/google/article.cfm?article_id=12420

Welcome Warren Kinsella Reader(s)



A slew of great columns by some of Canada's sharpest minds debunk the myth of Warren at www.kinsellasux.blogspot.ca
I'll update it from time to time, but few people really write much about the self-proclaimed "Prince of Darkness" anymore. 

It's Official: My First (Modern) Political Book


NON-FICTION: Canada

Canadian English-language rights to KILL THE MESSENGERS: STEPHEN HARPER’S ASSAULT ON YOUR RIGHT TO KNOW by The Fog of War author and censorship, propaganda, and information-control  expert Mark Bourrie, about how the federal government operates in secret and undermines the democratic process, eliminating public servants and processes that fail to toe the party line, have been sold to Janice Zawerbny at Thomas Allen Publishers by Denise Bukowski at The Bukowski Agency, for publication  in fall 2014, in advance of the next federal election.

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The Crooked Politician Will Provide

My latest piece from Ottawamagazine.com

POLITICS CHATTER: The crooked politician provides all (if you’re a reporter with bills to pay)

Years ago, when I was a skinny, skittish young cub reporter, I found myself kicking a chair and cursing at some outrageous stupidity committed by a politician. A long time has gone by. I no longer remember who I was angry at or the nature of his transgression.
But I do remember, as clearly as the day it happened, a wizened old city editor beckoning me over to his desk. Moving a couple of ashtrays aside so he could set down his coffee, he leaned over, his yellow teeth shining in the green light of the primitive video display monitor, placed his right hand on my shoulder, and uttered these words, which I recount here exactly as he told them to me:
“Embrace the crooked MP, bonehead mayor, the greedy Indian chief, the smug and profligate premier, my son. Let them roam in packs across the land.
“The crooked politician will provide all.
“The crooked MP gives our children straight teeth. He digs our swimming pool. He fills our mutual funds and RRSPs.
“He puts clothes on our backs. Food on our tables. Gas in our cars. The crooked MP makes the car itself and fixes it when it breaks.
“The bonehead mayor gives us trips to Jamaica and puts new roofs on our cottages. She makes us bookcases and fills them with books. She pays the hydro and phone bill.
“Someday, she will buy you an iPhone 5, whatever that is, and pay your monthly cell phone bill.
“The greedy Indian chief provides for us even in the most lean of times. He fills our pages when there is nothing but weather stories and tracts about the meaning of Santa.
“The smug premier makes our suits. He crafts nice watches. He feeds our pets, fixes our appliances, cleans our carpets. He makes donations to charities in our name, gives toonies to panhandlers, and buys  General Tao’s Chicken and delivers it to our homes when we are too tired to cook.
“So be careful what you wish for, my son. Do not hunt these great and generous creatures to extinction. Embrace them, nurture them. Let them run free to do their work.
“Just do not love them.”

Monday, January 28, 2013

Kill the Messengers

In early 2015, my book on Stephen Harper's lock on government information and the crippling of the press, which is no longer able and willing to do its work as one of the watchdogs of government, will be published by a respected national publisher.
I hope to hear from reporters who have been intimidated by the Prime Minister's Office and/or by flacks from any party. I'm also looking for people in the bureaucracy who have been gagged. My book will tell their stories and discuss the impact of media control and ratfucking on Canadian democracy. It will argue that openness and truth -- in both government and media -- are the only way out of the political malaise in which we find ourselves.
You can reach me at mbourrie@yahoo.com with your stories.
I'm re-starting this blog as a way of connecting with facebook friends and twitter followers. I decided last week to close my accounts on the two social media sites and resume blogging. This way, I can reach more people and still converse with friends and contacts through my email account and blog comments.
If you have ideas for the books, let me know. And I appreciate any flowers or brickbats that you might like to send.
As well, please follow my Politics Chatter blog at Ottawamagazine.com and my work on Blacklocks.ca.

cheers,
Mark



Saturday, September 15, 2012

The Toronto Star on "Wife Spanking"

I guess times have changed. At least I hope so. I came across this while doing some research on Holy Joe Atkinson, the creator of the modern incarnation of the Toronto Star:

Toronto Star editorial, March 1, 1938 

The Spanking of Wives

Husbands and wives in every part of the American continent and possibly throughout the world, have been intrigued by news from Winnipeg that a man in that city had been convicted for assault for spanking his wife and a year’s sentence suspended over his head. The unfortunate husband may have been influenced by news reports to the effect that in other communities had commended he-men for administering chastisement that the court considered to be well-deserved. Everyone will agree that the uncertainty of justice towards such a matter constitutes a grave domestic problem in the nine provinces of confederation that has its counterpart in other countries. Most decidedly, it is unfair that the authorities should leave husbands in doubt about the extent of their marital rights, privileges and responsibilities.

In this particular case at Winnipeg the husband may have been indiscreet. He resorted to corporal punishment to break his wife of the smoking habit. Now as everyone knows that habit has become fashionable among women and as prim and proper a woman as the Queen Mother smokes an occasional cigarette. Thus the Winnipeg man was a decade or two late. The time for husbands to spank their wives for smoking passed a long time ago, if ever they were to set themselves against the practice, before the habit became accepted as a matter of course.

A lone man, setting himself against the customs of his times, plainly invited disaster. He should have known that his fellows had capitulated without reserve and that he could expect no aid or empathy from that quarter and at the best only surreptitious sympathy from a few. As likely as not the majority of men-folk would explain that they were too broad-minded to object when, in reality, they lacked the courage.

Thousands of years ago, a king who was befuddled with wine sent for his royal consort to dance in semi-nakedness before his boon companions. The queen, to her everlasting credit, declined to obey his majesty’s command. The men-folk were thrown into consternation by the queen’s disobedience and decided that their lives would not be worth living of the example set by the queen went unpunished. So a new queen was chosen, and every husband breathed more easily. The men of today are not so tough nor so arrogant. They would not relish the prospect of a war between the sexes. Has not the League of Nations proved that sanctions are a thing of the past?    

Sunday, July 08, 2012

Saturday, July 07, 2012

Today in Free Speech, Part 1:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV34ILvv3fc

Old, but still lots of fun. And Kinselllout still works for them.

Meanwhile, the classless Lilley, who's never broken a big story in his life, attacks Glen McGregor's recently-deceased mother. All class, Brian!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=NaGF1sZWH1I




Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Rob Snow, Master of Business

Rob Snow is one of the right-wing experts on all things financial employed by Ottawa's exquisitely lame CFRA radio station. When he's not hectoring the Government of Canada, the Government of Ontario and the City of Ottawa about their financial management, he's railing about the follies of the Greek, Italian and Spanish governments, and their big bank bailouts.
He's the host of CFRA's Business at Night. And he's the frequent interrupter of CFRA money markets commentator John Budden.
Perhaps Snow learned financial management the hard way. Seems he's had his own brush with insolvency.
Records of the Office of the Superintendent of Bankruptcy Canada (File 33-1235131) show Robert Lowell Snow declared bankruptcy  on July 20, 2009, with assets of $3 and liabilities of $54,251.
His assets included $1 equity in his leased truck, which features prominently among his Facebook photos.
Snow owed the Bank of Nova Scotia $8200 in bank loans and $35,250 on a line of credit. He owed $6,000 to CIBC, $1500 to the McGrath Brothers collection agency, $1300 to MoneyMart and $2000 to Wells Fargo.
Snow blamed his bankruptcy on over extension of credit and illness.

Wednesday, February 08, 2012

Pimping in the Streets of Ottawa

Well, I’ll be a dirty bird.
Roll me in eleven herbs and spices and call me Kentucky Fried. I’m shocked and appalled. Outraged. Think of the kids.
I think I’m getting ahead of myself.
Last week, people on Parliament Hill and the handful of viewers of Stunned News were subjected to the moral outrage of Sun TV staffers spewing spittle on their camera lenses because the CBC was peddling soft-core porn on a Radio-Canada web site.
Seems Radio-Canada had a partnership deal with an outfit in France to produce a soft-core romp comedy called Hard, which centres on some chump who inherits a porn magazine business. Sun denounced the entire CBC and trashed them for using taxpayers’ money for smut that’s posted for easy viewing by your kids and mine.
I’m very happy that the Sun folks troll the Internet looking for porn. I know there is some out there, so I am always glad when someone takes the bullet for me and warns me off smut sites. I’m sure my adolescent children don’t look at porn on the Internet, but that could change. Thanks, Sun TV, for looking out for them.
My gratitude turned to rage when I picked up a free copy of the Ottawa Sun, mere blocks from one of the city’s high schools. Left in a coffee shop for anyone to pick up, this newspaper had (except for some World Cup skiing results),a page of ads for actual prostitutes.
Not softcore porn.
Not hardcore porn.
Actual sweating, grunting, rutting whores who are eager to seduce our young people and break up our families.
And it gets worse. (I’ll get to that later.)
Let’s see what’s on offer in the Sun’s classifieds.
There’s the gay cruiseline. Nothing wrong with that, but I don’t want my six-year-old to read it. And an ad for Shemale Suzy Hung. Not sure what’s going on there, but it looks too complicated for me to figure out over just one coffee.
There’s the eager Mistress Whitney, offering “Exp’d Dom & Fantasy” which sounds vaguely Italian. And one ad had the heading GRAND OPENING, which is not only suggestive but rather daunting.
You can get take-out or eat in. You can bring your spouse, or two people can come to your house. You can get girls whose parents can’t spell, people like Katerine, Lany, Jordyn and Ashlyn.
Here’s where it gets worse. Some of these vermin are actually hiring.
Yes, the Ottawa Sun is engaged in a campaign to lure our daughters, our wives, our sisters, our mothers, and maybe our little brothers, into a life of whoredom. That’s why, when the Sun newspaper delivery guys come by my house, I will set the dog on him.
Unfortunately, my dog is a female. They probably want to recruit her, too.
I don’t know what’s happened to morality in this country. Where, oh where, is the idea of a “family newspaper?”
While I do thank the Sun for trolling the Internet and protecting me from inadvertently stumbling on taxpayer-funded filth, I simply cannot forgive them with sprinkling whore recruitment ads around our high schools and on city busses.
Enough is enough, I say. Someone should pass a law.

Friday, February 03, 2012

Freedom 55?

I’ve been struggling with this topic. It hits pretty close to home and sparks a bit of an existential crisis. In a couple of months, I turn 55.

I’m an author of 10 books, with another coming out this fall. I have a PhD — my thesis was published to great reviews in just about every newspaper in the country. Excerpts ran in Esprit de Corps, the Halifax Herald, the National Post, and the Ottawa Citizen. I’ve had academic articles published. I was invited, as a scholar of the media in the Second World War, to contribute to a collection of essays to commemorate the work of the renowned historian Terry Copp. My co-authors are among the best historians in Canada. I’ve won a whack of media awards, including a National Magazine Award. I’ve written for every big paper in Canada and most of the small ones as a freelancer.

And I’m unemployable.

As I said, I’m pushing 55. The very few jobs that open up in the news media are given to kids who work cheap and are completely pliant. In academia, young PhD grads are preferred, despite that they’re quite likely to become deadwood after they get tenure and spend 15 or 20 years teaching the same old courses.

I’m not alone. A recent survey found almost 28 percent of workers aged 45 or older felt they had been discriminated against on the basis of their age. I suspect the number of people over 50 would be even higher.

The first story I wrote for Ottawa Magazine was about Olive Dickason, a brilliant historian pushed out of her job because of her age. Dickason had been a journalist most of her career, but went back to school when she was middle-aged and earned her PhD. Her writing was fantastic. Her book, Canada’s First Nations, is probably used as a text at the University of Alberta, which fired her because she was old. It’s required reading in Native history courses everywhere else.

Dickason took her case to the Supreme Court of Canada. She spent her forced “retirement” writing and updating her books and advising students as a volunteer adjunct professor at the University of Ottawa’s History department, which had the good sense to make her feel welcome.

Now, I suppose I have no one else to blame for having spent my time learning two buggy-whip trades — journalism and academic history. But what I see in my life is becoming the norm through the workplace.

Older workers are expensive. They aren’t always pretty. There’s a misconception they can be stubborn — that they don’t understand younger people and their trends. Often, they’re older and more qualified than their potential bosses. Yet they tend to be eager, especially if they’re changing careers and are given a break.

What does that have to do with politics? We all know that governments have a tough time preventing discrimination in hiring — even for government positions. And, to be frank, fairness in hiring has never been an obvious government priority.

This is the problem: the old age pension eligibility date is about to rise to 67. Changes to the Canada Pension Plan will make it more difficult to retire early, even though often the present choice for older workers is welfare or early CPP.

So what happens to the person who loses their job at 50? Head to Walmart and get a job as a greeter? Flip burgers? Try to start a business?

I’m not griping about the proposed change to increase the OAS age to 67. I think, though, if we’re going to adapt to the new demographic reality, we need to look at the lack of value for, and the outright discrimination against, workers who are 45 and older.

I’m more than capable of supporting myself because my skills are portable and I’m adaptable. My books sell well, I have some great magazines that will run my work, and I teach the odd university course. But there are so many blue- and white-collar workers who have specialized skills that don’t translate to consulting, self-employment, freelancing, or whatever you want to call it.

And, unless that workplace mentality changes, we’re going to see an awful lot of people falling into poverty if they lose their jobs in late career, and that hardship will last even longer as the government expands that limbo period between middle-age and the arrival of the first pension cheque.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Election blog

Ottawa Magazine is hosting my blog through the election.

You can read it at www.ottawamagazine.com

Monday, March 28, 2011

Blog - Day 3 of the Run of the Rodents

Sir Robert Borden is burning in Hell.

He must be. After all, he’s the only Prime Minister of Canada ever to lead a coalition government. Sir Bob, as good a Conservative as ever drew breath, wanted to draft Canadian boys to fight in the trenches of Flanders in World War I. So he made a deal with the dev…, er, Liberal MPs from English Canada, and cobbled together a Union Government.

Now, I do understand that Stephen Harper would rather be caught by a CBC camera crew in a Hull motel room with Leanna VIP than head anything with “Union” in the title, but I wouldn’t rule out a Harper-led coalition.

And if he did put one together after this election, hey, that’s how the system works.

Yes, Steve Madely, (who was flayed by Paul Dewar and David McGuinty on CFRA this morning when he tried to re-write the constitution in an exercise in mental gymnastics that became sad and painful to listen to), you read that right. That’s how the system works. The Westminister parliamentary system. Not the U.S. presidential system, though, as Al Gore learned the hard way, he who has the most votes does not always win there, either.

In most elections, the vast bulk of Canadian voters actually cast their ballots for candidates of parties that do not win. A political party can come to power with a majority having won about 42% of the vote. That gives almost unbridled control over the mechanism of state to parties that won about two out of every five votes cast.

(Adolf Hitler came to power under the same circumstances, never winning anything near a clear majority. Having taken power in a coalition government, Hitler tossed his opposition into concentration camps, burned down the parliament building and tore up the constitution. I hope I am not giving anyone ideas here.)

In 1985, Frank Miller, a Progressive Conservative, won the most seats in an Ontario provincial election. He named a cabinet, recalled the legislature, and brought in an amazing budget that did every nice thing, short of giving everyone free Molly Maid service. The Liberals and NDP worked out a deal – what they called an “accord” – published it, and made it clear they would vote Miller down in the legislature.

Now, this is where it gets interesting. Frank Miller did not go bawling onto your TV screen. He did not call his opponents thieves or traitors. Despite his taste for plaid suits, acquired during his years selling cars in Muskoka, Frank Miller had some class.

Miller went to the Lieutenant Governor, told him the PCs did not have the confidence of the legislature, and asked the Lieut. Gov. to call on Liberal leader David Peterson to form a government. Peterson did so, governed for two years, then won a solid majority.

And that’s the way the system works. We elect Members of Parliament. We do not elect Prime Ministers. And the person who has the support of a majority of MPs gets to govern.

Stephen Harper knows this. His first two budgets were supported by the Bloc. He’s used the votes of separatist MPs, socialist MPs and even of Stephan Dion himself to stay in power. When the rules suited him, he was eager and ready to play by them.

How do I know this?

Got it right from the horse’s mouth. Here’s Harper explaining it all to the strangely-coifed Paula Todd on TVOntario in 2004: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDTmpXj9vyM&feature=player_embedded

Saturday, March 26, 2011

New Ottawa magazine blog post

Ottawa magazine Blog-Day 1


Back in the early 1970s, psychiatrists at what was then called the Ontario Hospital for the Criminally Insane came up with a great idea to cure psychopaths and serial killers. They would crowd them into a small room, prevent them from leaving, and force them to learn co-operation and empathy.

For 100 days, they would be cut off from visitors, mail, radio, TV, newspapers. They were not allowed to smoke cigarettes. The lack of physical space was supposed cause them to make small concessions to each other. They would learn empathy.

But the Hundred Day Hate-In was a failure. Rather than communicate with each other and change their ways, the inmates spent their time in isolation looking out the window, watching groundhogs frolic in the green fields of Penetanguishene.

Imagine being locked for 37 days in a steel tube with Stephen Harper, Michael Ignatieff or Jack Layton, plus their handlers and a bunch of reporters. Certainly, there’s a psychiatry thesis in there somewhere. It may not be 100 days, but the potential for crazy-making must be about the same.

And, as most of us know, there are no groundhogs at 40,000 feet.

That’s why anything can happen in a campaign. Canadians always say they don’t want an election. Unfortunately, we cannot export our ballots to Egyptians and Yemenis, who have faced tanks to win the right to vote. Nor, yet, have we outsourced our politics to Calcutta or Xinjiang.

So we are stuck with elections and the strangeness they create. Serious issues will be reduced to slogans. The workings of a $250 billion-a-year government will be explained in platitudes. Strangers will come to your door. People in very expensive suits will say how worried they are about your job.

None of them will take your kid to the dentist, although Jack Layton would probably do it if his hip didn’t hurt so much. As for your laundry, you’d probably have to explain the workings of the machine to Michael Ignatieff. You could count on Stephen Harper to feed your cat, when he’s in town. The guy loading your garden shed onto a flatbed truck with Quebec plates is Gilles Duceppe.

But to get an honest answer about how the books will be balanced without big hits to the Ottawa magazine readership, about Canada’s ongoing military adventures abroad, the real cost of new fighters, about real reforms to make government open and democratic, would take more than a Hundred Day Hate-In, let alone just 37 days of entrapment in buses and planes.

There are lots of uncertainties. Will Demerol make Jack Layton an interesting speaker? Will Michael Ignatieff be caught wandering the darkened streets of Whitby seeking a meal of human blood? Will Stephen Harper’s hair be caught in the wind, hurling it into flesh of a fresh young Tory campaign worker, a member of the rally prop guild?

Will Gilles Duceppe’s addiction to crumpets, marmalade and boiled sausage be exposed? Or will someone find a secret PCB dump behind Elizabeth May’s house?

As certain as Peter Mansbridge’s head will shine tomorrow morning, something unexpected will happen in this campaign.

After the Hundred Day Hate-In, one murderer said “I’ll shine people’s shoes, but I can’t love them.” Politicians may feel the same way about us. And, in their efforts to shower us with money, flowers, compliments – anything but real love – we should find some reason to either dance with the one that brung us, or seek out some new action with the strange dude with a coffin in the basement.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

For Kady

Halifax, VE Day: A Censor Describes a Riot
H. Bruce Jefferson

Jefferson, a long-time journalist in Nova Scotia, was the government’s press censor in Halifax during World War II. Jefferson was a packrat who, from his room on the top floor of Halifax’s Lord Nelson Hotel, acted more like a spy than a censor. He photographed convoys and warships as they came and left the city, kept tabs on all of the U-boat attacks in the northwestern Atlantic, was wired into Halifax’s busy gossip grapevine, and, months before the Halifax Riot, predicted there would be trouble at war’s end. During the riot of soldiers and sailors that followed the announcement of V-E Day, Jefferson wandered the city looking for material to send to his superiors and colleagues in Ottawa. Jefferson blamed the riots on the snobbery of Halifax business owners and residents who, he believed, had no qualms about fleecing soldiers and sailors stationed in Halifax while, at the same time, snubbing them. The riot ruined Adm. Murray’s career.

Because the weather forecasters predicted rain for tomorrow, the Halifax committee had decided not to await Churchill's announcement of VE day, but to shoot their fireworks ex George's Island this evening.
The display began about 2100 hours, and Citadel Hill was absolutely jammed with thousands of people watching the affair, which lasted for nearly two hours.
As soon as it was over the crowd began to come down from the hill, serious rioting broke out on downtown street. First I saw of it was a dull glare over Barrington street, where they had set fire to two street cars, and upset a police patrol car, letting the burning gas run over the pavement.
Through the open window we could hear the crash of glass as window after window went in, and soon over the roofs we could see the crowd breaking into the Sackville street liquor store.
About 2 a.m., I got a car and toured the devastated area, which did not look too bad at that time, broken glass being the main item. Three of the liquor stores bad been looted, and about 250 RCN shore patrolmen were gathered around the fourth, on Agricola Street in the North End.
This had not been touched.
By this time the rioters had gone home, and nothing more happened Monday night.
During the late evening I passed stories for Dennis, Ken Chisholm (Globe & Mail) and several others, all somewhat lurid and placing the damage at $1,000,000.

May 8, 1945.

This morning had several enquiries from locals and wire services about coverage of last night's riots, which I assured them were wide open, as no security was
involved.
In the afternoon I attended a short garrison drum-head service of prayer and thanksgiving on the Garrison Grounds, back of the Citadel, and just west of the old Atlantic Command HQ.
There was quite a large turnout of troops of all branches (Navy, Army, Air Force and women auxiliaries) but they did not show any particular enthusiasm over the business-- as it turned out, their thoughts must have been with their brethren down town.
Coming down Sackville Street, near the corner of Barrington, our ears were greeted with the now familiar sound of falling plate glass. I spent some time observing the scene from various angles, and it kept getting worse and worse as the afternoon advanced. When most of the plate glass had been smashed, people climbed into the windows and kicked in the glass or thin wood backs of the show windows, and entered the stores. In some cases goods were thrown from upper windows to the crowd below, in others the stuff was merely carried out.
Generally speaking, the service men, principally navy although there were lots of Army and Air Force boys, too, took the physical and other risks of breaking and entering, while the civilians cheered them on and carried off the loot.
There was absolutely no interference with them by city or service police or RCMP. There was so much going on that it was like a 43 ring circus, and no one person could begin to follow all of it. For example, one Barrington street crowd broke into Eaton's store, and for a time it looked as if nothing was being taken, but in the meantime another crowd had obtained entrance through Granville Street, and were carrying goods away by the ton through rear doors and windows.
It was the same everywhere.
As we passed the corner of Granville and Sackville, some people were looting the best shoe store in town. A man would appear at a window up two or three flights, with half a dozen shoe boxes in his hands, and throw them down to pals below. On the way down the boxes would open and the shoes get scattered, and then one fellow with a number seven worth $15 a pair would be hunting for somebody else who had the mate and vice versa.
There were all kinds of comic incidents, such as the old lady who must have been 75 or 80, with her dress covered with old war medals, who came up the
car tracks arm in arm with a young airman, each drinking from bottles of beer and singing lustily. Later they did a sort of square dance in the intersection of Sackville and Barrington, and one of the locals took and printed a picture of it. In some ways it reminded me of a scene from the French revolution movies.
I forgot to mention that when I came out of the hotel shortly after noon on my way to the Garrison Grounds, I noticed a number of beer parties beginning on the lawn around the Cornwallis statue across the drive from the Nova Scotian. Other sailors kept arriving with cases on their shoulders, and I vaguely wondered how they had been able to save it from the night before. It turned out that they were even then looting Keith's Brewery, and as we went up South street more sailors kept arriving, and a standard salutation was "Well, I see the liquor store is open today, after all."
At one point a civilian came dashing down the line to warn the sailors that RCN patrol trucks were touring the city snatching cases back from sailors, and that they had better get rid of the boxes at once. This proved to be a racket. When the sailors would rush to hide their boxes under verandahs, etc., other civvies would call them away on one pretext or another, while still others made off with the cached beer.
One man told me he was looking for hard liquor but was unable to locate any. Some friends invited him into have a drink of beer. While they were chatting,
a policeman who knew him came in and said: "What are you doing here?" He said: "Having a drink of beer." The cop said: "O.K. but let me have that box of brandy you're sitting on."
One of the last places attacked was Birks' store, and they made quite a mess of it. While watching the crowd go through Birks, I ran across A.D. MacNeill, former owner of the Glace Bay Gazette who sold that sheet to the U.M.W. when he had to retire on account of ill health, and learned for the first time that A.D. has been living since October at 129 Spring Garden Road.
It was at this time (about 1855 hours) that I heard a horn car coming through the crowd, and a voice which I recognized as that Admiral Murray commanding the service people to go home to their barracks. For a moment I thought that he must have made a record of the kind sometimes used in these cars, but in a few seconds, I heard an impromptu remark from the horn which showed me that the Admiral himself was on board, and when the car came past I recognized him in the front seat.
The gist of his remarks were:
"This is the Commander-in-Chief, Admiral Murray, in person. The mayor of Halifax has declared a curfew effective at 8 p.m. Any service personnel found on the street after that hour will be subject to the full penalties of the law."
Some sailor must have interjected a wisecrack as the car went by, as the Admiral said: "This is the Commander-in-Chief speaking -- and that’s not funny at all." I did not hear the statement attributed to him by the Chronicle and Star and others to the effect that "You don’t want to get caught with loot, do you?" or words to that effect. From the general tenor of his remarks, I would gather that if he did make such a remark it was only ambiguously worded, and meant that they would not want to expose themselves, etc. for staying after 8 P.M.
The Admiral came around several times, completely circling the district, and there were slight variations in his remarks each time. For example, someone must have asked if this applied only to service people, because on his second circuit he took pains to specify civilians as well as personnel were subject to the order. (Which, incidentally, I am informed by one of the brightest legal minds in Cape Breton is all baloney and has no standing in law whatever.)
However, the bluff, or whatever it was, worked. As soon as the Admiral came around the first time, all service people on the spectator side of the street
began to move away toward barracks, etc. and within a short time even the rioters departed, except for a few in the stores who possibly could not hear the horn or had not taken in what it said.
To my mind this indicates that if similar action had been taken earlier, the whole business could have been avoided. It was the slowness of action that permitted the chief destruction to occur.
I have been told that while there was some desultory activity in other parts of the city, on Gottingen Street and elsewhere, no damage of importance took place after the admiral made his rounds. Thousands were still AWOL but were parked with beer cases in such dark spots as Point Pleasant Park, Camp Hill Cemetery, etc.
The job was a very thorough one, and cleaned out the various business areas completely. Barrington was smashed and looted on both sides from the Convoy cafe (which is between the Nova Scotian park and Morris Street, for a distance of two miles to the end of the store district above the Dockyard. Gottingen is smashed from Cogswell to Stadacona. The East-West streets like Spring Garden Road and Quinpool Road escaped attention altogether. But all the hill-side streets lying between Brunswick and Water street in the old city were cleaned out in toto.
Woods’ -- the place Jacques was asking about -- was the only downtown store to escape glass damage or looting. Why, Lord only knows as their clothing prices were terrible. They took no chances on a second visitation and boarded them up right away. Everything else along there was smashed.
The crowd also smashed some of the windows in the Mounties barracks (old Halifax Hotel) not the plate glass lobby windows, but smaller panes in the adjoining Julien section. There were all kinds of queer sights, such as looters using the RCMP verandah to lay out their dresses, stockings, etc. and pack them into neater bundles for carrying. Cash registers lay all over the streets with their keys bent and twisted.
(I picked up a brand new quarter on the curb in front of the little Ideal store, where some fellow was busy bagging up sugar for himself out of a bin beneath the counter.)
When we went home to dinner, a sailor's dream was being enacted on the front steps of the Nova Scotian. A captain (four striper) was standing in stiff dignity waiting for a taxi, with a sailor in a jersey haranguing him and the crowd on the Navy and what he thought of it. In front of the captain in civvies, was an old jovial veteran of the last war, with one leg and crutches. Both the veteran and the sailor were pretty drunk, and behind the captain was an open mouthed audience of retired duchesses from the hotel hanging on every word. The sailor, however, was good-natured and polite, although drunk, and refrained from any really naughty language. The conversation as I came up was going something like this:
Old Vet: "Now, me lad, you shouldn't be carrying on like this. Remember you are a member of the Silent Service."
Sailor: "To hell with the Silent Service. I wasted three years and a half in it, and they can take their silent service and put it you know where."
Old Vet: "Tut, tut. That's no way to be talking in front of your captain."
Sailor: "He ain't my captain and you can put him you know where."
Old Vet: "You wouldn't talk like that to him if you were on the quarter deck."
Sailor: "I ain't on the quarter deck, and neither is he, and you can take your quarter deck and put it you know where."
Old Vet: "Have you no respect for your superiors in rank? Don't they teach you any discipline in the Navy?"
Sailor: "They ain't my superiors except in rank, and I've seen all the captains and admirals I want to see for the rest of my life, and you can take your captains and admirals and you can put them you know where."
The sailor carried an open bottle of rum in his left hand and never lost his polite leer and this went on and on until the skipper's taxi finally arrived and he left in a cloud of dust much to the chagrin of the aforesaid dowagers and duchesses who apparently were getting quite a kick our of it. Similar scenes were going on all over town, although there were no attacks on officers with the exception of Commander Smith, who was found on King's campus with his head bashed in, but there is some uncertainty whether this was an accident or someone settling up old scores.
Although I did not see it myself, I understand that some of the Cwacs and Wrens also distinguished themselves in the "Battle of Halifax," which was a long while getting here but turned out to be a lulu when it finally arrived.
I heard one yarn about two Wrens who were fighting half a dozen sailors in a vacant lot bounded by a board fence, lined with spectators who applauded lustily as one side or the other scored a particularly telling point.
The harbor side of Citadel Hill staged the biggest beer picnics in the history of the city, and there are some almost incredibly, but apparently yell authenticated yarns about genuine "orgies" which went on in such public places as Grafton Park and Cornwallis Park (in front of the NSH).
One of the features on the Commons was a nude dance put on by members of several of the services. Apparently old Robespierre and the boys would have felt right at home in the Warden of the Honor of the North on May 7-8/45.
A lot of this stuff no doubt will come out at the official hearings.
We had very few submissions on this event, in fact mostly enquiries, from the newspapers and services. The wire censors (as old soldiers mostly) were shocked beyond words, and frequently referred the flamboyant stuff that was being sent, out in query and story form by various local feature writers at last free to give full rein to their natural instincts in the matter of exaggeration.
I passed everything, telling the boys that there is no censorship on this. I had a particularly strong kick about Eric Dennis including rape as one of the features of the day, and I think this is a fake, or at least based on very slight grounds, as no such charge has appeared since in local courts. All accounts of the day's activities agree that this would have been a work of supererogation.
Neither of the locals had intended to publish today, but on account of unusual circumstances, both Mail and Star put out extras replete with editorials, stories and pictures.
The Mail blew rather hot and cold, one front page editorial deploring the incident and demanding vengeance and recompense, while another took pains to point out that the whole Navy should not be blamed for the actions of a comparatively small number.
The Star rather stole the show with a front page editorial actually naming Admiral Murray as the person responsible for the whole business by reason of his alleged failure to take prompt and vigorous action to stop the rioting before it got started again on the second day.
In the evening, over CHNS, Admiral Murrary made a short statement in which he maintained that naval personnel were only a small part of the shock troops and that civilians were primarily to blame for both breaking and looting.
He was followed at 1900 hours by Mayor Butler, who followed the Star lead in naming Admiral Murray as the chief cause of the trouble, demanded compensation, and added the charge that many of those (provosts) sent to quell the rioting had in fact deserted to the rioters.
(Mr. Pickering, an old soldier who works upstairs, had predicted this very result if small pickets were used against the rioters, saying that the same thing happened in 1900 when Halifax troops sent on a similar errand hid their rifles behind fences and joined in the disturbances. He was through Boer War troop riots in Newcastle and Durban, South Africa, in 1899, Halifax: riots in 1900, and additional local riots in 1917, 1918 and 1919, and qualifies as something of an expert on the subject.)

May 10, 1945.

Last night Bob Rankin (managing editor of the Halifax Herald) told me that they were going to give Murray the ride of his life. I said: "I thought he was a pal of yours"? Bob said: "Like Hell he is. He hates my guts and I hate his and I am going after him in good style."
Today they did assail the Admiral but still not as outspokenly as the Star did yesterday.
In reply to Mr. Isley's appointment of Cousins, Port Administrator, to investigate the riots, the Star ran another front page editorial "Cousins Won't do," and concurrently Cousins notified the acting premier that he felt this should be handled by a judicial rather than an administrative officer.
This about brings the developments up to date, and I add a few comments of my own, based upon local observation:
1. Apparently the Admiral did not realize the extent of the damage until he made his first round in the horn car at 6.55 p.m. Up to that time he had been relying on reports from subordinates, a bad feature of the Navy and also rampant in the RN. Even as good an officer as Bonham Carter sometimes would not know of the presence of an important ship until three or four days after she arrived.
2. There seems to be a tendency to jump on the Admiral now that they think they have him down. Stories even were circulated that he had left town when he heard about the murder or whatever it was of Commander Smith. I am also skeptical about the reports that the chief of police couldn't get him at 11 p.m. One surprising thing about Murray, for a conservative brass hat he certainly is, that he answers the phone himself at both office and home, instead of straining calls through servants, secretaries and so forth as is the usual custom of higher officers.
3. From the prompt response to his first order to get out of the devastated area, I think there would have been no afternoon riots on the 8th if this had been done during the progress of the one the night before. After all, although there were thousands and thousands of people on Barrington and adjoining streets, not a tenth of them were active rioters. The rest were merely spectators. Even the actual heavy civilian looters were confined mostly to men, women and children from the poor relief and red light districts on the streets immediately below the citadel.
At the same time there were thousands of what I might call "incidental" minor looters, such as well dressed people of all ranks who obtained small souvenirs of one kind and another, or picked up packages of cigarettes sown broadcast by celebrating sailors from tobacco stores, etc.
4. It was the best natured riot I ever attended. There were a few comedy fights between sailors and other rioters, but absolutely no friction between rioters and civilians. In fact it was not unusual for some fellow staggering toward a window with a club to bump a civvie and stop and say "Excuse it, please," only to resume his crashing the next minute. In fact the rioters seemed to enjoy their audience and were stimulated to new exertions by it.
5. There are said to be three main reasons for the riot, and no doubt dozens of minor motives. But in various parts of the disturbance I heard a number of scattered sailors giving reasons like these:
(a) They felt that their time in the Navy has been wasted. Presumably they expected to be sent to sea and instead were kept ashore on piffling jobs which they felt could have been carried on by any kid, thereby missing the promotion they might have had in their own trades.
(b) They felt that they have been rooked and robbed by Halifax landlords and profiteers. I heard many men make statements to that effect during the riots, and many civilians who were not rioters remarked that they had a just grievance there, although this was not an effective solution.
(c) They resented the actions of retailers who have made fortunes out of them during the war, barricading their places as against criminals. Particularly
they resented the closing of the liquor stores several days before VE Day.
Innumerable remarks were overheard to the effect that "this is one time the ratings as well as the messes will have their liquor."
(I am informed that in the Navy each officer is allowed a monthly quota of six bottles of rum or whiskey, which he is able to purchase for about $1 each, while the men have to come down town and pay full prices (averaging $5.) at the public stores.) Although I am not a liquor store or beer parlor fan, seems to me that better judgment was shown by old Enos Collins and the pioneer profiteers of 1812-14. Their custom on VE Day was to put a hogshead of rum in the public square and let all hands go to it. When that one was gone, hey put out another until all hands were dead drunk and there was no further danger to premises. It was cheap insurance and apparently worked.)
6. While the streets looked as if a V-bomb had hit them during the actual riot and shortly afterward, and a returned officer told me that it looked as bad as some the captured towns in Italy, actually the substantial damage is not so very great.
With the streets swept of glass, and the store fronts boarded up until new plate arrives, buildings show no other signs of exterior damage. Nor is the interior damage much, except to breakables like show cases and china.
For example, right after the riot I went in to see the damage at the Casino Cafe, just across the square from the NSH. The windows had been smashed, some of the pictures and silk fittings torn down and so forth, and the place was dirty and looked like the wreck of the Hesperus. Proprietor said "You buy bonds, you help the war, and look at this. Even the Germans wouldn't have done worse if they bad come."
However, I notice today that he had resumed business and the interior shows little signs of damage. Most other restaurants are making a similar comeback with the exception of a couple of notorious gyppers who were given the works. Norman had a close call, but showed great t presence of mind in meeting them at the door and lining them up at the counter for cigarettes, coffee, muffins and so forth. They left with three cheers, but later his windows were broken by another mob, but this did not damage the interior of his place.
As far as the general run of store-keepers is concerned, I think the situation is this: Actually the rioters have done them a favor by cleaning out the old war worn fixtures and junk. They will now get full compensation from the government and be in a better position than ever.
Col. Powers, who himself is highly indignant over the business, told me today that he had been talking to his Montreal of Ottawa HQ and had found that the reaction in Upper Canada was: "Served them right for profiteering. The Halifax store-keepers had it coming to them.” One bad feature of the affair was that owing to the large number of participants, no discrimination was made between those who had rooked the sailor and those who had treated them fairly. Local papers are compiling a list to show that some of those looted were war veterans, or had sons or daughters in the armed forces. This, however, in Halifax, means little or nothing, as I am told that some of the worst profiteers are war vets themselves. Since the place was founded in 1749, it has been noted for war profiteering, and for the unusual fact that profiteer families invariably have been heavily represented in the actual fighting forces.
7. Complete breakdown of police protection. There was absolutely no police attempt to interfere with breaking and entering, looting, etc. Some truckloads of naval police arrived at various times, and after standing uncertainly for awhile, disappeared just as the worst atrocities were being committed.
In Sydney, where rioting of the same general character occurred about the same time, city, service and RCMP combined forces and easily drove the rioters out of the business district. I think the same thing might have succeeded here. Instead the police adopted a policy of non-intervention and watchful waiting, meanwhile taking the names of all they could identify. These people are now being locked up and raided. A few already have pleaded guilty and been sent to the pen.
One comic aspect of the raids was that in many cases police searching for goods stolen from stores on the eighth, turned up big caches of United States Army rations, tinned fruits, candy, cigarettes, etc, from the wreck of the Martin van Buren (January) referred to by me in previous rulings. In one instance they unearthed a truck with the original January load still in it.
8. It appeared to me that most of the service MPs or shore patrols had no police experience. They drove up in their trucks and then stoop about uncertainly.
An example: When I visited Agricola Street at 2 a. m. Tuesday, there were about 240 shore patrolmen grouped about it, and no successful attack was possible. For some reason these men were withdrawn and only two Mounties remained inside. A few hours later the place was attacked by a large mob and the Mounties, unable to resist such a crowd opened the doors themselves, I am told, to avoid unnecessary damage to the building.